SKIP TO CONTENT
We use both our own and third-party cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. If you continue to browse, we consider that you accept the use of these.

  • Celebrating 20 Years of Training Excellence 2004-2024

REGISTER
REGISTER

Suspect Invokes Miranda

Nov 1, 2013 — by Charles Gillingham — pdf

I recently got a call from a detective questioning whether he could question a suspect who invoked the right to an attorney when that suspect called him and told the detective he wished to discuss the case. The answer is fairly straight forward but worth a brief review and apply to cases where the suspect invokes the right to counsel or the right to remain silent.

Suspect Changes Mind

After a suspect invokes either the right to remain silent or the right to counsel questioning on that case may begin again if the suspect tells the officer she wants to talk about the crime. The officers must insure four things have taken place to have that discussion be admissible.

1. The suspect must have initiated the questioning.
The court looks to whether the suspect somehow contacted the officer. Detectives can leave a card for a suspect when she invokes and invite the suspect to call at a later date. If the suspect says she might be willing to talk later, officers can check at a later date. If the suspect invites you to come and chat at a later time you can.

2. The suspect freely re-initiated contact.

The suspect must not have been threatened, bullied, or coerced to re-open questioning. Any threats of the prosecutor or court going hard on a suspect may vitiate the freely initiated contact.

3. The suspect agrees to open up general questioning.

You are not limited to the case that you are investigating, you can question about any other crime when the suspect re-initiates questioning. The only thing courts look at under this prong is that the suspect must be willing to talk about the case generally, not questions for instance about the procedure after arrest, talking about a deal, talking about another case or offering to help. The request by the suspect must be one to have a general discussion. Clarify what the suspect wants to talk about prior to having the conversation.

4. Read the Miranda warnings.

If you keep these four requirements in mind, a statement made by a suspect after she invoked will be admissible against her.

 

  • Effective teaching teams! The presentation of the material was consistently interesting, and intelligent without being too intellectualized.

    —Michele Keller, Deputy Probation Officer, County of Alameda

  • This was, by far, one of the most useful training classes I've attended since becoming an investigator.

    —Steven Aiello, Antioch Police Department

  • It not often that you go to a training that you really, really want to pay attention to. Because of the high quality information and style of presentation, I knew that if I looked away I was going to miss out.

    —Quinten Graves, Oregon State Police

  • This training provided the useful tools necessary for assessing the veracity of a suspected child abuser, which goes a long way in helping to protect children.

    —Sunny Burgan, MSSW, LCSW, Social Work Supervisor, Santa Clara County DFCS

  • I will continue to use and pass on this information because I really believe in the instructors and their approach.

    —Kimberly Meyer, Washoe County Sheriff's Department

  • I highly recommend this training for any Probation staff who have the necessity to interview/interrogate individuals for investigation purposes.

    —R. Bret Fidler, Santa Clara County Probation Department

  • Instructional style is engaging and highly effective.

    —George Laing, Fire Prevention Captain, Investigator

  • Your training gave me the confidence and tools to interview the suspect for over 5 hours and to bring a closure to the case.

    —Daniel Phelan, San Jose Police Department

  • Incredible training with amazing real world instruction. I have been taking law enforcement classes for over 30 years and by far this is the best presented and most useful.

    —Det. Brian Dale, Portland Police Bureau

  • The information presented was highly relevant to my job and was presented in a manner that was organized and very easy to digest.

    —Michael McGarvey, California State Prison, San Quentin

  • This was, by far and away the best training I have received in 15 plus years of Law Enforcement. The instructors are experienced, engaging, articulate, and very entertaining. I will be recommending this training to multiple agencies.

    —Mark Paynter, Oregon DOC

  • Your training has made the greatest and most direct impact on my assignment of any training class that I've taken.

    —Ken Gelskey, National City Police Department

  • This training by far has been the most informative and most effective I've attended. The instructors engaged the students in a manner that made me want to speak my opinion, ask questions, and participate.

    —Julio Ibarra, Merced County Sheriff’s Office